Skip to main content

Symphony: Collaboration as Curriculum (Part 4 of 5)

Collaboration versus Compromise
Image by Peter Nilsson and Brent Hale
Bill Newell, co-founder of the Association of Interdisciplinary Studies and its Executive Director for over 30 years, agrees. Agreement, that is, is part of collaboration, and interdisciplinary work requires some agreeing.

When describing true interdisciplinary work, Newell uses the word “interperspectival.” He says, “A discipline offers a perspective on the world: a way of evaluating knowledge. Interdisciplinary Studies draws on disciplinary perspectives and integrates their insights through construction of a more comprehensive understanding.”

“There is the unfortunate presumption,” he continues, “that interdisciplinarity simply requires bringing people from different disciplines together and having them talk. Too often, the result of conversation between people with conflicting worldviews is that they agree to disagree. Or, they compromise. Interdisciplinary studies develops techniques for creating common ground that go way beyond these outcomes.”

As Newell’s descriptions suggest, Interdisciplinary Studies focuses much more on process than on product. It is about techniques and habits of mind. It involves seeking out diverse perspectives, evaluating and modifying insights, and integrating understandings. What Newell describes is an academic approach to collaboration, a pragmatic process that brings out new understanding through working relationships. Ultimately, the goal of Newell’s interdisciplinary work is to solve real-world problems—wicked problems that require teams of people with disparate knowledge to work together, find common ground, and reach conclusions that none alone could have reached. It sounds like humbling work.

~

Bill Newell, co-founder of the Association for Interdisciplinary Studies and its Executive Director for over 30 years, identifies four Interdisciplinary Habits of Mind:


1. Drawing Insights from different perspectives into a complex issue
    • Strive for adequacy in each discipline, and feel for its perspective.
    • Seek out diversity of perspectives for richer/comprehensive understanding.
2. Evaluating Insights
    • Assume each disciplinary perspective has at least a kernel of truth.
    • Bracket and set aside or suspend personal convictions.
    • Seek out all sides of argument; avoid overstatement/overconfidence.
    • Look for strengths in arguments you dislike, weaknesses in those you like.
3. Modifying Insights
    • Seek commonalities not compromises; look for win-win scenarios.
    • Think holistically, contextually, systematically.
    • Think dualistically (either/or) in drawing on disciplinary perspectives, but also inclusively (both/and) in integrating their insights.
    • Embrace contradiction: ask how solutions can be both.
    • Use the techniques for creating common ground (redefinition, extension, reorganization, transformation) in adjudicating conflicts between disciplinary insights.
4. Integrating Insights into a more comprehensive understanding of a complex issue
    • Expect multiple causes and effects.
    • Look for unexamined linkages and unexpected effects.
    • Be responsive to all perspectives but dominated by none of them; strive for balance.
    • Integrate as you go; don’t wait for all of a discipline’s insights.
    • Don’t fall in love with a solution until the full complexity of an issue has been explored.
    • Value intellectual flexibility and playfulness.

(from Newell, William, Interdisciplinary Education: Theory and Findings (presentation slides). Paris, OECD, October 14, 2013)

~

This is the fourth in a five part series about collaboration.


These posts appear together as an article in the Winter 2014 issue of Deerfield Magazine.

blogger analytics
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Four Ways to Measure Creativity

Assessing creative work has been a bugaboo for a good long time.  In schools it's the constant refrain: “How can you grade creative writing?”  or “It’s a poem: however it comes out is right.”  In businesses and elsewhere, people demand innovation--and are stymied with understanding how to measure it. But this is not the bugaboo we think it is--in the classroom, or in the broader world of creative work.  Here are four different ways to assess creativity, each designed for different settings: 1. Measuring How Creative a Person Is - The Guilford Model 2. Measuring How Creative a Work Is - The Taxonomy of Creative Design 3. Measuring Creative Work Against a Program - The Requirements Model 4. Measuring the Social Value of Creative Work - Csikszentmihalyi’s Model Notably, in each of these cases, what we mean by "creative" changes a little.  Sometimes "creativity" refers to divergent production (how much one produces, or how varied it is).  Sometimes "c...
8 comments
Read more

Taxonomy of Creative Design

Strategies to improve creativity are many, but they are also diffuse.  Little ties them together in a way that offers a coherent vision for how creativity can be understood or developed incrementally.  The Taxonomy of Creative Design, a work in progress, offers a new theory for doing so. Since creative work can be measured along spectrums of both and form and content, the Taxonomy of Creative Design offers a progression from imitation to original creation measured in terms of form and content.  In doing so, it organizes creative works into an inclusive, unifying landscape that serves not only as an analytical lens through which one might evaluate creative work, but also as a methodical approach to developing creative skills. Here is a closer look: Imitation Imitation is the replication of a previous work.  It is the painter with an easel at the museum, painting her own Mona Lisa; it is the jazz musician performing the solo of the great...
11 comments
Read more

A Cognitive Model for Educators: Attention, Encoding, Storage, Retrieval (Part 2 of 14)

So how do  people learn?  What are the mechanics of memory?  Can we distill thousands of articles and books to something that is manageable, digestible, and applicable to our classrooms?   Yes.   In brief, the cognitive process of learning has four basic stages: Attention : the filter through which we experience the world Encoding : how we process what our attention admits into the mind Storage : what happens once information enters the brain Retrieval : the recall of that information or behavior Almost everything we do or know, we learn through these stages, for our learning is memory, and the bulk of our memory is influenced by these four processes: what we pay attention to, how we encode it, what happens to it in storage, and when and how we retrieve it. Here’s a closer look at each: Attention: We are bombarded by sensory information, but we attend to only a small amount of it.  We constantly process sights, sounds, smells, a...
Post a Comment
Read more